Conflow
-
Posts
1,934 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Conflow
-
-
Igor,
This might help you ~ You may not be aware that there is a "Conflict of interests" between Microsoft and the Mozilla-Foundation
in that certain Browser-settings of:- Internet-Explorer 8 ,9,10 are in conflict with Firefox 19, 20 Browsers.....and this has been
going on for the past few weeks.
EXAMPLES:
(1)
You can no longer use "Firefox 20" to download and install certain Microsoft-updates such as updates for MS Security-Essentials.
You will get an unexplained "Failed-Notice".......But when you use IE-Explorer 7,8,9 all things work perfectly !!
(2)
You can not install certain other "Microsoft-updates" and "Service-Paks" having downloaded them from the "Firefox-Browser".
(3)
If anyone downloads or updates their Browser to IE-8 ~ IE-9 ~ IE-10......This will immobilise certain function's of their existing
"Firefox-Browser" and effectively bring it to its knee's as certain "Firefox" files are erased.....that happened here last Saturday.
4)
When using the above mentioned "Microsoft IE-Browsers" IE-7, 8, 9 we found that at least 1 in 8 Web-Pages were slow to open
and at least 2 in 15 failed to open at all ~ we dont know why ~ and we tried our 6-PC's on different ISP-Providers and its not that.
But for certain there is something going on between Microsoft ~v~ Mozilla.
Microsoft do offer a solution to these problems provided you have one of their Browsers open on your Desktop where after you
have to select "Tools"-->Internet Options-->Advanced Tab-->drill down to-->Security and change certain settings within that List.
However messing around with the 'Security-options" can lead to other major problems....(You need to Google this problem).
Brian (Conflow)
-
Leo,
I wonder why you copied my previous Post of 10:40.pm (above) and re-submitted it in your name
at 07:17.am this morning ~ but without any added comment from you what so ever. ?
Perhaps its a 'Forum-Error' as that has been playing up for the past 24 hours and I certainly did
check my Post for editing purposes and there was no 2.nd copy at that time of Posting .?
Brian (Conflow)
-
Igor,
The following might be of some help ~ As you know since the introduction of Windows XP (all versions) ~ Microsoft introduced a utility called "WGA"
(Windows-Genuine-Advantage) whereby the PC would call Microsoft and check the validity of the installed (OEM) "Operating-System-Key-Code".
This utility was placed within the "OP/System-Installation-Disc" and from there it was transferred to the PC together with the full Operation-System
where after it would call home on a regular basis and because it was embedded in the PC.Registry the PC-owner could do nothing about it !!
With Windows-8 that has all changed ~ New (OEM) "Op-System-Key-Code" are now embedded in the Hardware ~ the "Machine Bios-System" and
apparently they can't be changed ~ but it can be interrogated by Microsoft at any time of their choosing ~ there is a universal name for that !!!.
Perhaps this new Microsoft procedure is interfering with your "Product Script-Key-Code" ~ its just a thought !!
Brian (Conflow)
-
Hi Eric,
Its very difficult to answer your's above without getting into Microsoft-Marketing politics and the impact that's having on:- XpSp3 ~ Win.7 and Win.8 ?
And what's happening behind the scene's with adjustments to Windows-7 making it compatible with the "Touch-Screen Technology of Windows.8 ?
Now ~ Win.8 can be downloaded "Freely" on request. ~ So ~ Microsoft is giving Win.7 users a "Free" Operating-System...That's a first for the Books ?
Apart from the "subtle-changes" to Win.7... And having downloaded Windows.8 to try it out.....That unfortunate Windows.7 user will find that he/she can
not completely revert back to Win.7 ~ Having first uninstalled their "Free" Win.8....The changes made are irreversable.....It's the price you pay for Win.8 !!
Remedy:- Full Re-Install of Windows-7 and install IE-8 before you use or install IE-9.
'Desktop-Gadjets' were an attractive addition to Win.7 for Marketing-purposes ~but as time went by~ things started to go wrong particularily with some
(topend) Graphics-Programs which demanded the " full-screen" Desktop-Utility into which Microsoft had previously planted their desktop-gadjets.
Various conflicts took place between the "gadjets" and other (intensive) Graphics-demand's consequently some of the "gadgets" were quietly dropped
and others are no longer available for downloading......Adding to those problems were the demands of Windows-8 "Touch-Screen-Technology" now
however some of these "gadjets" have become an integral part of the "Windows.8-TST System" (You can Google these issues should you wish to).
Concerning the "Windows-7 Forum" (below) and also the "Windows-XP Forum" (below) these are run by various concerned Engineers in the absence
of full "One-2-One" support from Microsoft...They are "Ad-supported" but these are static and non-invasive and Membership is not obligatory but the tech
support is superb.....Just park your query in the (top-right) Search-window and this brings you to the appropriate responses.
Hope this has been helpful,
Brian (Conflow)
-
Hi John,
Well my guess about you using Desktop-Gadgets was correct ~However~ Microsoft are quite adamant that these should be "Uninstalled" not mearly turned off.
Gadgets are part of the "Desktop-Picture-Software" as shown on your PC-Monitor. These reside in the 'Desktop-Registry' section of the Win-7 OP/System.
If it was my Win-7 PC I would "Uninstall" the Desktop-Gadgets ~ OR ~ Alternatively I would "Disable-them" with the routine given in the the "Link" shown below
then I would run the Windows-7 Repair Tool ~ If that didn't work~ I would uninstall them completely and get my Slideshow working as it should do.
http://www.sevenforu...le-disable.html
"Gadgets" have a very bad track record and these can go faulty after downloading an Anti-Virus Program or New-Drivers or even a perfectly innocent Program such
as PTE. ~ The proof is in the comparisons ~ Your Sony-PC runs your Mp4-Files but the Win-7 fails to do so ~ But Win.7 is telling you what's wrong and in particular
its telling you that one or more of those Desktop-Gadgets are defective and it clearly shows that in the "error-strings" I brought to your attention,viz:-
The " 0a9e Error-Strings " which refer to 'Gadgets' are shown in your Screenshots and its really up to you to rectify those defects before they impact something else.
Brian (Conflow)
-
Hi John,
I have just read your Posts and studied your Screenshots and I must admit I was somewhat surprised with the number of (open) Drives
shown on your "Pid-Listings" together with the great amount of Google-Chrome Exe's listed there and I suspect that you have downloaded
various Widgets from Google-Chrome or else imported them from another PC like a Vista-PC.
In particular have you imported or downloaded "Windows Desktop Gadgets" ?....I ask this because your Screenshots show the following:-
"Additional-Information-Notes from 1 ~ 4" and in each of these Snapshots they are showing the full "0a9e Error-Strings"...
These "Error-Strings" are particular to "Windows Desktop Gadgets" which were decommissioned by Microsoft some time ago because they
inter-acted with various O/S-System-Files in Windows-7 and previously they same happened with Vista....I suspect you have this problem.
Attached below 2-Papers on this Microsoft problem and it might be worth your time following them up.
Hope this helps...
Brian (Conflow)
-
There is something not quite right here....
By any chance do you have 2 x PTE-Programs running concurrently on your XP..??
You also wrote:-
"I am having problems with exes produced on version 7.5 which won't run on my Compaq computer running XP"
A)...In our Workshop we run "2 x HP-Compaq Presarios V-5000.Series" and these Laptops run everything thrown at them.
"The exe takes a long time to load and then only gives the sound. The pictures at all just a black screen"...
A)...This is a typical response of a Computer suffering from inadequate "Memory-resources" and a a fairly full Hard-Drive.
...In retrospect, the Presarios only come with 1.gB User- RAM-Memory and Virtual-Memory is set at <!.gB (variable)....C)..XP-Sp3 needs at least 2.gB User-RAM-Memory and Virtual-Ram needs to be set to something similar + 40% Clean-HD.
D)..The maximum 'User-Ram' for XP (all-versions) is 4.gB but it can only use 3.6.gB of that ~ the sysetm uses the balance.
Exes produced on previous versions (7.0 and before) work perfectly...
A)...Thats quite true but PTE.7.5xx provides many 'new-functions' which will stretch your current RAM-Memory to the limits
particularily so if your Hard-Drive is over 70% capacity and File-Indexing is turned "On" (see above paragraph).
I have tried to update the Intel video card driver but it appears to be up to date
A)...Makes no difference ~ In my opinion this Laptop need's a...Memory-upgrade...+Virtual-Memory expansion...+Cleanup.
As I previously wrote, our HP-Compaq.V5000's run everything thrown at them ~ I would seriously advise you to contact a
competent Computer-Technician and have him look at the Laptop before you loose confidence in it..(Show him this Mail).
Wish you all the best and a speedy remedy to this problem.
Brian (Conflow)
P.S..Make sure you're not running concurrent PTE-Progarms.
-
Gary,
Yes in the initial stages of the HTML5-Trial ~ "YouTube" genuinely believed Microsofts claims for compatibility with HTML5
so did thousands of other PC-users like yourself ~ until the provrbial XX hit the fan, then all hell broke loose and then the
problem was compounded with defective upgrades from Adode-Flash ~ I know because I got caught out also ~ so dont
blame your PC !!
Dont be tempted to try "Internet-Explorer 10"...Its only 875.kB and it's simply an attempt to increase the "rendering" speed
of HTML5 unfortunately its way behind Crome-Firefox-Safari and their use of "WebKit" which has really broken the mold in
a most spectacular way. Although I'm grateful to Microsoft for all their other utilities they really need to get their act together
with HTML5.
If I come across a solution for your problem I shall let you know immediately.
Brian.
-
Hi Gary,
(Please use full-screenview)
Yes you are are stuck with an "Ogre" on this problem ~ I dont have any quick answers for you about getting rid of HTML5-Files in Internet Explorer
but let me explain why as follows:-
1)
Internet-Explorer (versions): IE.6 ~ IE.7 ~ IE.8 ~ IE.9 ~ These never supported HTML5 although Microsoft were "messing-about" with this for the
past few years even to the extent of dropping "snippets" of the HTML5-Code into users PC's through updates.... only god knows why ??.
Please Google "internet-Explorer and HTML5" if you have any doubt's about the above statement.
2)
The You-Tube "HTML5-Trial" was deliberately pitched at "Browser-Uses" of: Google-Chrome ~ Safari ~ Firefox ~ and it was quite specific about
those qualifications ~ but unfortunately many Internet-Explorer users opted to give it a "try-out" and were left with the problems you now have.
3)
During your "Trial-period" many HTML5-Tags and small HTML5-Databases were dropped into your current-version of "Internet-Explorer" but this
in itself was built upon the (original) Core-version of IE which came "pre-installed" on your PC which in turn has been upgraded time and time
again with various service-paks such as SP.1 and SP.2 and SP.3 for XP and other service-paks for Vista and Win7. Those HTML5 Tags etc; have
modified the Core-version of your 'pre-installed' Internet-Explorer which can not be Uninstalled.
4)
There have been many attempts by hundreds of others like yourself trying to get rid of those HTML5-Tags etc; but to of no avail unless you remove
all the Service-Paks and all versions of .Net-Framework 4,3,2 right back to .Net-framework.1 ~ only then can you uninstall your current IE-version
and get back down to the IE-Core-version ~ then some 'Registry-editing' is involved to make it clean again ~ Where after you have to re-install the
whole "shabang" all over again. The only other alternative is to contact a proficient Registry-Editor Technician or perhaps you might like to Google
"Uninstall HTML5 Tags & DB-bases" for yourself.
5)
The reason that...Google-Chrome ~ Safari and Firefox render HTML5 so effectively is because they are using a relatively unknown utility called...
"WebKit" which is an open-source development which Apple claim to be theirs...which is untrue !!...However this open-source utility acts as a very
efficient super-fast "renderer" particularily with HTML5 and with the Video-format: M2TS which You-Tube are developing in an effort to get rid of the
poor-quality Flash-system. The format "M2TS" is approximately a third the size of a Pte-Exe with very near the same quality.
Sorrry I cant help you with your problem but at least you now know whats going on.....This is a "Hornets-nest" amongst Microsoft and Adobe who are
now in a fragile partenership in trying to get HTML5 working in "Internet-Exlorer 10"...They claim it works, but since it came out in January, users tell a
different story....personally I feel that they may drop IE.10 and opt for some new version of...HTML5+WebKit....of course under a different Brand-name
such like Internet-Explorer.11.
Apology for the long post...
Best regards,
Brian (Conflow)
-
Gary & Ken,
I'm a late arrival here ~ but for what its worth I uninstalled "Adobe-Flash" from my Laptop and 3 other PC's for the reason it nearly
drove me mad in January after downloading its latest 'updates' at that time ~ they were all defective !!
I also found out that I dont really need it all because most "Multi-Media Players" will quite happily play Flash-Video (flv-files) and
I have proved this with:- VLC-Player ~ Media-Player Home Cinema ~ Al-Show Player ~ and 2 more.
However 'Windows-Media Player' and some others wont play Flash-files.
I use the "Pale-Moon Browser" which is an independent "FireFox" derivitive specially designed to utilise the best features of
IE-6, IE-7, IE-8 and IE-9 without their limitations but made to work much faster with the modified FireFox-Engine.
Link and Screenshot below for those who want to try my Set-up...
Brian (Conflow)
Link
-
Xaver,
You wrote...."Show stops while the speaker makes a live comment (length unpredictable) with the asynchronous music in the background).
For this application you need asynchronous music with synchronized crossfade sections"....
Thats exactly what I had shown in the Analog-Model in my #4 Post above ~ I thought it might be of interest to you and others to show exactly
what's involved......I shall leave it at that and hopefully Igor may have a look at the suggestions.
Regards,
Brian.
-
Xaver,
See the attachments below, I have made a Model of this ~ Is this what you are suggesting ? ~ If so I can see real technical problems in
trying to impliment this feature in Mp3-format (most popular sound format) ~ The problem is trying to preserve the integrity of the Mp3-Tags
within the Voice-Over (Backing-track) and dropping back into the Main-Sound-Track in such a synchronised way as not to 'clip' the Tags
within that Track.
Yes, in a Recording-Studio its not a problem as there is always a highly accurate (silent) 'Master-Sync-Tone' much like the Dolby-19.kHz
Pilot-Tone used in "Dolby-AB.Noise-Reduction Systems".
In PTE it could possibly be done by jumping out of the Main-Program into an external 'Sound-Exe-File' but the problem would be returning
to the Main-Program and picking up onto the next whole Mp3-Tab. If any Tag within an Mp3-File is 'corrupted' or damaged in any way the
Sound-Track simply freezes. We also have the problem where 'sets' of Tag's are assigned to the Left & Right Stereo Channels respectively.
Its not an easy one to crack !!
Brian (Conflow)
-
Colin & Geoff,
I have been doing this for the past 3 years using PTE-Avi converted to Mpeg2 Video with AC3 Sound, and before that for some 6 years in
the old 4:3 Television-format for Technical-Presentations to Municipal Engineers and such like......I make Video-Reports for these people.
Yes the quality is very good once the files are properly Authored ~ indeed if you want to go to the limits of quality the M2TS-Format is really
absolutely superb even with (standard) Widescreen TVs (16:9 format). The MT2S-format is designed for Blue-Ray Systems but it can be
Authored down to DVD-format containing the necessary Video-TS and Audio-TS folders.
Brian (Conflow)
-
Here "Video Player" only denotes a (rather new) style for the normal navigation bar. Presently it does not have an exit button.
Regards,
Xaver
Xaver & Gary,
Understood ~ so it has some attributes but not the Exit-Button ~ it's difficult to understand why not !! ~ but on reflection on
other (down-loadable) Video-productions these don't have an Exit-Button either just:- Pause,Play,Back,Forward and most
depend on the Keyboard Esc-Button.....I wonder why ?
Many thanks Guys,,
Brian (Conflow).
-
Gary,
Ever since version PTE 4.12 (long time ago) the Exit-Button could always be placed on the lower 'Nav-bar' provided the 'Nav-Bar' was
set-up in the 1st place. The same applies to the latest version PTE.7xxx in its EXE-Format.
But you are using a Video-Format not an Exe and it seems that the 'Nav-Bar' can be made available in that Format but consider this:-
If the 'Nav-Bar' was set to 'Auto-Hide' then the Exit-Button would also be hidden.........is this a possibility as to what's happening ??
See attached Image.
Brian (Conflow)
-
Brian,
The above is also true when using a 1920x1080 MPEG4 file on a USB Key plugged into a suitably equipped TV.
Full control is possible and leaves the PC free to work on while viewing/pausing the tutorial.
It's a viable alternative to the CD/DVD.
DG
Dave,
I completely agree with you ~ however ~ in our case we are obliged to leave the CD-Report with our Client and
the Master-CD stays with us for reference purposes. In relation to Televisions we use the 1280x720 format
because its the "Universal-TV.16:9 Format" (Standard Wide-Screen Sets) and not all DVD-Players & TV's will
accept USB-input nor will they accept HD-(Home-Cinema) Wide-Screen-Format of 1920x1080.
I think that the 1920x1080 for Tutorials might not be as 'Universal' as one would like ~ this is a matter of choice.
But speaking for Conflow we prefer the 1280x720 because its the normal PAL-TV-Standard not to be confused with
the new HD-TV (Home Cinema) Standards of 1920x1080 which is still in a state of Universal-standards acceptability
for Television-Production Companies as to whether they are going to adopt the Interim-standard of 1080 or HD 1920.
Who can tell whats going to happen here !!
Brian.
-
Geoff and all,
I appreciate you dont use Video for your Shows and Tutorials, but consider the following facts which we use in our Techical-Reporting work:-
1)
Firstly we use (fully-authorised) Universal DVD in 1280x720 format with AC3 Sound which plays on all DVD-Players and most TV+DVD Sets
and can be presented on Conferencs-TV's and Digital-Projectors..
2)
We easily make multiple ISO-CD/DVD-Copies of the original and for short Videos less than 6/8.minutes any good 800.mB-CD will suffice.
3)
With the "Video-Tutorial" on your TV you can: Pause~Stop~Rewind-F.Forward ~ WHILST ~ runnning the PTE-Program (live) on your PC.
4)
This means you are "Hands-On" with the PTE-Program whilst following "Instructions" from your TV-Set being controlled by its Remote-Control.
5)
This technique is "Learning by Example" compared to switching backwards and forwards from the Tutorial to PTE on a single PC or Laptop.
For us:-
Presenting (paperless) "Video-Technical-Reports" far excell's any other method of presentation because its controllable and easily copied and
retains audience attention without the distraction of 'paper-shuffling' trying to find page 9 in 20 pages.
Might be worth a try converting PTE-Tutorials to DVD format....
Brian (Conflow)
-
Mike,
Go down to the "Equipment & Software" section of the Forum where I posted a program called "Multi Media Converter" which
can (rip) record parts of ~or~ a whole DVD. This software may suit your requirements as you specified above.
Brian (Conflow)
-
Hi Geoff,
You might like to use or try-out "Mobile Media Converter" which can (rip) record directly from a DVD or from part of a DVD
where after you can use a Video-Editor to clean-up your recording before importing it into PTE.
Screenshot and Link below.
http://www.snapfiles...econverter.html
Brian (Conflow)
-
Brian I did as you asked and got exactly the same results as Xaver got using his project naming, so there would definitely seem to be a problem in PTE. Whether or not this is related to Peter's problem I wouldn't like to say but chances are there is a link somewhere.
Geoff
Thanks Geoff,
Yes there is definitely a 'logic' problem' within the program ~ I think its an unfortunate choice of words to describe ~ Undo - Save As - and Save commands.
You can replicate the problem in any 'Image-Editor', simply select an Image ~ then modify it ~ now you are given 3 choices, Undo, Save, and Save-As.
Even if you 'Undo' the changes within the Image you have the choices of Save or Save-As ~ if you choose 'Save-As' it offers to save the File under its original
name and to get around this you must choose a different name. However if you choose 'Save' it simply modifies the original File and then closes it.
Brian (Conflow)
-
I have observed similar effects (as described by Peter) with earlier versions, as well.
My recent test with v7.5.3:
- I open PTE for a new project, enter two images, save it as Test1, and close it.
- I open Test1, and save it as Test2
- Without closing Test2, I insert another image, followed by pressing the undo button.
- Again, I go to "Save file as ...", and PTE suggests to save it under the name of Test1.
- I cancel saving, and try to close my present project (which is Test2), but PTE asks me if I would like to save changes to Test1.
- I cancel closing the project and insert another image.
- I try to close the project (still Test2) again, but PTE still asks me if I would like to save changes to project Test1.
There seems to be something wrong!
Regards,
Xaver
Xaver,
This is a special request ~ could you repeat the above routine again but this time do not name the Files as "Test1" or "Test2" etc....
Would you rename them as 01-Test and 02-Test ~ but follow the same sequence routine as above and see what happens.
I might be wrong but I think this is a logic-problem,viz:-
You wrote..."Without closing Test2, ~ I insert another image ~ followed by pressing the Undo button ~ Then I go to "Save file as XXX
and PTE suggests to save it under the name of Test1.
To me this is very logical because Test2 was left in the "Open" state and in that state it was "Undone" but did you 'Undo' the added
Image before saving the File ~ if not ~ how is the Program to know what is what ??
Just a thought....
Brian (Conflow).
-
Hi Peter,
The following may help ~ When one is 'File-naming' and using Alpha/Numeric characters you may have forgotten the 'File-Naming Rule':-
Numeric-characters always take precedence before Alpha-characters: Example a File named as "Test-Foto.1" will always cause sequence
problems in Windows whereas the same File properly named as 01-Test photo, 02-Test Photo, and 03-Test Photo and so on will always
retain their numeric sequence and will also allows for individual changes without "cross-naming" conflicts....
Its a Windows rule and I doubt if Pte would depart from that regime ~ try it out and see if you can replicate the error experienced ~ if so then
its a genuine Pte problem.
Brian (Conflow).
-
Eric,
There is one product which will give you:- Image + Music + Commentary and Control of a Slideshow and superb quality
and could be adjusted to Mp4-Size Format......its Microsoft "Powerpoint-Presentation" and I think it can be uploaded
to You-Tube etc....it also runs on virtually every PC made....its worth a try !!
Brian (Conflow).
-
Wonderful Job !!
Congrats Igor to you and your Team and not forgetting the Forum-Members who on a daily basis
contributed to all the beta-testing of PTE 7.5
Memo: It seems that the 10th Anniversary of PTE will occur on the 6th December 2012 ??
Brian (Conflow)
Looking for an alternative to Roxio
in Equipment & Software
Posted
Peter,
The following may suit your requirements:-
Ashampoo Burning (Free)
Ashampoo Burning (Pro)
Terrible name ~ But one of the best Software providers in Europe and we have used their products over
the past 10 years and in our opinion they are simple to use and virtually 'bullet-proof'.
We use their "Burning-Studio Suites" for the production of DVD's (Full Mpeg2 - Mp4 - Pte.Exe's and more),
There are extensive Auto-Disc-Check features within the both programs this to prevent time wasting Coasters.
Here is their Link:-
https://www.ashampoo.com/en/eur/pin/7110/burning-software/Ashampoo-Burning-Studio-FREE
Let me know how you get on ~
Brian Kelly (Conflow)