Jump to content
WnSoft Forums

morturn

Members
  • Posts

    206
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by morturn

  1. I don’t want to open up a debate about copyright on music tracks, I think that’s been done to death several times. However as a photographers and filmmaker, copyright on music tracks does have an impact on the work we do. I think most of us prefer to do the right thing when we can too, so it is always nice to find a source of quality music tracks that we feel we can use, without attracting the attention of the righteous police.

     

    I thought I had done this with a company called Audio Network. They have a number of reasonable music tracks, with an option of buying track to suite their use, i.e. home and none monetarised You Tube publications etc.

     

    I bought some tracks and published a couple of films on You Tube only to find that Audio Network had made a claim for monetarisation, and consequently I now have some distasteful (in my opinion) advertising popping up with my films.

     

    I wrote to Audio Network who responded by saying:

     

    Thanks for your email.

     

    The home/student licence is a non-commercial licence for use on YouTube. However, in lieu of the low licence fee we maintain control over the monetisation in order to generate revenue for us and our composers. This licence allows you to use the tracks in any videos that aren’t promoting a business, product or service.

     

    If you don’t want advertising over your videos, our current policy is to release claims if the uploader has a corporate licence or above. If this is something you’d be interested in, please let me know.

     

    Now a corporate licence is £120  per track, so to me, buying the track as home/student licence user is a waste of time, you have effectively bought and paid for nothing. You may as well go and use any track of the internet and just agree when You Tube monetarise your video.

     

    Company’s like Audio Network always open the debate with the moral argument, we are getting the best deal for our composers. However we have to understand who the prime beneficiary is, Audio Network is a commercial company. I did get back in touch with them, as they did offer to release one track, but to me, this is just papering over the crack.

     

    This is my response, I would welcome your thoughts or comments of how we as photographers and filmmakers can get a better deal:

     

    Many thanks for your email….

     

    I will decline your offer to release the claim on my video, I see as papering over the cracks and not as a solution; however, thank you all the same.

     

    While I understand your moral obligation to ensure you are getting the best deal for your composers, and your commercial obligations to your company, what is on offer under your present pricing structure give nothing to the filmmakers or photographers. I personal feel that in this now digital age of social media, photography and filmmaking there is an incredible opportunity to promote the platform that the photographers and filmmakers provide that mutely rewards both the endeavours of musicians and the photographers and filmmakers too.

     

     

    With your current pricing structure, business model and terms and conditions, I have effectively paid for a music track, and ended up with nothing. I don't think I need to tell you that the internet is full of billions of music tracks, of which I can use on you tube and just agree the copy write claim. There is also an incredible about of quality work released under the Creative Commons licence; so why buy off audio network?

     

    As I have said, I have had some interesting conversations on this subject, where photographers and filmmakers really want to do the right thing, but there need to be a mechanism to do so.

     

    Perhaps if you do find a way to review your business model, please let me know, you have some superb music, but your terms of use are not for me.

     

    Thanks again 

  2. I am probably putting out crumbs to bring crows picking an attack, but I suspect that other than printing, all the fuss about perfect colors is largely bunk. Obviously, they can be off far enough to matter, but the post-processing done by our brain producing what we actually "see" has a whole lot more latitude than a difference of say R 50 vs R 55.

    Right or wrong?

    Having said that I worry about it anyway.

    Right, its easy to over think things, especially the ones you have a passion for and are in love with.

  3. Guerrilla knitters stitch up Saltburn Pier - Saltburn has once again been the target for some serious yarn bombingas the Guerrilla knitters have struck again - and how!

    If you strolled down the pier on Saturday you would have found it difficult not to notice pieces of brightly coloured knitting tied along the pier railing....

    Working under the cover of darkness, the elusive team stitched their latest creations to the railings on the town's historic pier....
    I have just posted a new slideshow in Slideshow club, I just could not resist photographing this amazing display of kitting on Saltburn pier. I love these accidental art gallery's that everyday people do for the benefit of the community.
  4. I would like to say that PTE was a key player in the production of this sequence, as was the technical support I have received from this forum and its contributors over a number of years. I was more than happy to place credit to PTE on the sequence, which is now being seen worldwide.

    Thanks again.

  5. Great slideshow, you have captures some amazing shots of an amazing building. Its is such a same that its due to be demolished, if it has not already; there must be a whole host of memories associated with this places as a school.

    Thanks fro sharing it.

  6. I do use face book for a number of reasons. Its is perfect for promoting yourself if you run a small company or a trust; its a great opportunity to promote you cause, allowing people to be kept informed of changes and to keep in touch with members.

    You can post details of events, milestones or offers, and see who may attend events and get feedback.

    While in the past face book may have had some negative reviews, it has both got its act together in terms of privacy of its membership and its client use. The younger generations were using face book in a very superficial way, however now a more mature population has really taken the bull by the horns and is exploiting face books facility's to the max.

    You just need to take your time to set up face book privacy setting and news feed notifications in a way that best suits you. The benefits are that you can keep in touch with a very wide audience.

  7. It is not always possible to get all your film shots done from a tripod, in fact a lot of media is filmed without.

    However when you are filming, you should in my opinion always aim to get shots that will not need stabilisation. Hand held filming need practice; the trick is not to try to hold the camera dead still, as this introduces vibration which does not look good. Instead the trick is to allow some full body movement so the movement flows gently. Watching news reports are great examples of this.

    Last year I was asked to produce a short promotional film for a heritage trust group, the practicality's of the site dictated that some hand held shots had to be made; I don't think that the results look to bad.

    http://youtu.be/uUNjdtE1TI8?list=UUr94oT1lZFb2vsKAfmYRsVA

  8. Hi Eric

    I have deliberately built in blurring to the sequences to make give it a film like look and make the sequence run smoother. In the film industry this is called 'shutter angle'.

    You can of course go for pin sharp images, if your looking for a more jerky action like look, which can be quite effective. In fact on the tilt and shift effects, dropping out frames of a film done in real time does give it a time lapse styles.

    Its one of those things where its worth experimenting, to get something that you like the look of.

    PS anyone want to buy a second hand Canon EOS 7D, one careful previous owner.

  9. MUR

    I thought the subjects were interesting, but the use of the animation was distracting away from the subject. Its almost like trying to listen to a violin quartet, with a firework display going on in the background.

    I would say that the artistic quality was fine, so was the subject and the theme, You have some nice establishing shots and some good close up images, I just think its over complicated.

    I would be tempted to remind yourself of the theme, this is a sequence about "A German town in Venezuela", it is not about a lots of dazzling animations. Everything your need is already in your slideshow, you only need to take away what is not really required. So ask yourself, does this spinning thing say "A German town in Venezuela"? if not leave it out; keep it simple.

    I would like to see this reworked, it certainly has potential to be very interesting in it own right.

    Thanks for posting it.

  10. Time-lapse is a series of photographs at pre determined intervals, stop motion is animated objects, that are photographed, then moved ever so slightly, then photographed again. the film is then played at normal speed. Wallis and Gromett are typical stop motion films.

    I have done this in PTE and it works remarkable well, ill try and dig it out.

    OK have found this now and uploaded it to slidshow club. So it seems I can upload, Ill give my time-lapse a try now.

  11. Once upon a time I was a Photoshop user and I seem to remember a feature which allowed you to "Extract Video Frames to Layers".

    Using this you could extract X number of frames from a video clip at a specified interval.

    I don't know how feasible it would be to extract the necessary frames and export them in a way in which they could be used to produce a similar effect??

    I think that IF it were possible it would mean far less wear and tear on a DSLR shutter? Shoot 15fps and extract one out of every 15?

    Any Photoshop users able to comment? Is there a limit on the number of layers? Could the Layers then be automatically saved as individual JPEGs?

    DG

    Dave

    That does seem to work, have just tested it on a short piece of video file. How it will work with very many layer to export I do not yet know, but it worth a go.

    This is the article http://www.designeasy.co/2012/12/extract-images-from-video-clips-in.html

  12. "Just a suggestion..

    Best regards,

    Lin"

    And indeed a good one, time-lapse is certainly heavy on the camera, but you can compromise on image quality. I shoot in the small raw setting, develop the image in RAW and then convert it to jpeg with an image size of 1.22MB. A used Nikon 1V1, or a new 1J1 would be an ideal buy.

  13. Very well done. How's your shutter on the 7D ? :):) (There is a new Mark II 7D due to be released in August so the rumours say).

    I did a show way "back when" using PTE ver 3(?) with 275 images over a one minute time span. PTE could barely handle it and I used 400x600 pixel images. At times it couldn't handle it. :wacko:

    I loved the tilt-shift (?) lens approach you used to make one sequence look like a model. Did you do that in one of the Adobe products?

    What did you use Premier Pro and After affects for ?

    Not sure how you managed to zoom in during one sequence.

    VERY NICE !!!

    PS: How did you get the copyrighted music (I assume it was) accepted by YOU TUBE? I know you lucky people in the UK had an arrangement to use copyrighted music for your AVs at a very nominal fee. We couldn't get anything like here in the colonies.

    I have had YOU TUBE balk when I used royalty free music. (in fact the composer himself was given a hard time when he used his own music on YOU TUBE)

    Time-lapse does give the shutter a good bashing, will have to see how it goes.

    Yes I did the tilt and shift effect in Adobe After Effects

    I used Adobe Premier to assemble the individual sequences and then assembled the slideshow and titles in PTE.

    I have put a small amount of zoom on most of the objects, more of a personal taste thing really.

    The track is from Audio Network and costs £1.00 sterling. They are very high quality interesting musical tracks, well worth £1.00, and are ok on You Tube as long as you acknowledge the use.

    I have also had you tube challenge some of my other tracks, I disputed both. I had the email off one author and the other was a genuine copy write free CD. I think sometimes they just try it on so they can put adds on.

  14. I really enjoyed this. I've had it on my list of to-do's since I used a sequence off you-tube in one of my shows. I read the mechanics at the end, but I'm still not sure how to proceed with my camera, (Panasonic FZ150 bridge) Did you use a burst setting technique? or just a timed shutter fire. What size exe did you end up with?

    Yachtsman1.

    Hi Yachtsman1.

    I use a timed shutter fire by hooking the camera up to an intervilometer, some camera have one built in. One frame every second. The EXE file is about 200mg, so its quite large. I am sure there are way to get the file size smaller, so I will have to work on that. Time-lapse are fun to do, you should give it a go, Gavein Hoey has quite a good video on you tube.

  15. I have been out taking a few photos of Birmingham UK city centre in the day, and evenings. I have compiled this images into a time-lapse sequence which has then been edited in PTE. I am not sure if we have discussed time-lapse sequences before here, but they are a lot of fun to do and can be very effective.

    I am having a problem uploading this one to Slidshow Club at the moment, so while I sort this out, here is the you tube version

    Your thoughts or comments are most welcome

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5DPZZyYr6ME

×
×
  • Create New...