Thanks for the reply, Peter. I get what you are saying with the landscap/portrait issue. Good advice. My shows will be end-run on PCs, with various levels of monitor resolutions, I presume. I want to knock out a show and include it on CD-ROMs mailed out with Christmas Cards this year, so I need to get hopping. So let's say that I build a presentation at 1024x768, which would seem to be a reasonable baseline resolution for most people these days. Furthermore, let's assume that all photos are of landcape orientation. Now comes the issue of varying aspect ratios for each photo. Typically, when I edit my photos, I crop for content, using a free crop and not looking to conform to any particular aspect ratio. Which isn't to say that I couldn't go back to the original files and re-crop to a multiple of the 1024x768. I do this when I want a photo to be used as wallpaper for the desktop or to be used in a screesaver. But usually, the 1024x768 crop results in a compromised image from the crop I originally intended (my photos start out as 3:2 images as well). From your reply, I take it that you prefer the restrictions of a fixed aspect ratio crop rather than having a show comprised of mixed aspect ratio slides. And it sounds like you solve that issue by compressing your 3:2 images to a 4:3 aspect ratio. I'm having a bit of a hard time wrapping my brain around that approach, but who am I to judge? Maybe you could elaborate a bit on why you prefer to pound your square images into a round hole, so to speak, rather than have the images in a show reveal themselves in their natural (as I envisioned the original crop) state? I'm not questioning your methods, but as I'm newer than new at this, I'm trying to understand the reasoning. I'm sure it all relates to optimizing the viewing experience, but since I've yet to put together show 1, I don't have a real good feel for things at this point. I do understand the part about resizing to a max resolution of 1024X768 and knocking the DPI down to 96. Lastly, assume again that I have built a full-screen show at a 4:3 ratio. Looking at the User's Guide (I haven't even downloaded the program yet, that's next on my list!) I see that on vesion 5, if you use one of the pre-set aspect ratios such as 4:3, you don't input an actual fixed-pixel resolution size. This is apparetly only done if you select a custom aspect ratio. Would you suggest using the 4:3 pre-set or specifying 1024x768 using the custom selection? Will using one or the other have any impact to the end user? If an end user has either a higher or lower monitor resolution, will the full-screen show be expanded or shrunk to conform to the smallest dimension of the user's resolution using either method? Intuitively, it would seem that one of the pre-set ratios would expand and contract accordingly whereas using a specified resoltion would not, but I could be all wrong about that. The guide isn't really clear on this issue. Thanks again, Russ