photoflora

JKB, thanks for your quick response (and Christmas greeting!) Happy New Year Everybody! Following up on your tips I can update as follows: I have rescaled my pan images to 72 dpi. No improvement. (Should have remembered to do this - very rusty!) I made a test sequence with just one of the pans in it and it still stutters at the requisite duration. If I give it much longer duration it becomes acceptably smooth. (This very basic test has presumably got no acceleration modifier in it - I didn't put one in, anyway!.) I'm working in the latest Windows version of Studio Pro. The stutter is in O&A, and in mini preview, and in full screen preview, and also in published sequences (i.e. videos made in various different settings, and an executable). So, apart from longer duration test I've still got the same problem! Any help would be most gratefully received! Time is running out! 😬

Apologies for posting this in the wrong place initially!

I have been using PTE for a good many years now but I have just encountered a problem that's new to me. I have created a sequence which starts with four long panoramas. The first one is my title sequence and it runs just fine at around 33 seconds long and it's overlaid in O & A with title text and a bit of video. The following three images were assembled in PhotoShop into a row from a series of single shots, and they have all got a problem with 'stutter'. They are quite simply used, though they're wider than the title image - the only image in each slide is the composite image, and they are shorter in duration than the title pan at around 20 to 25 seconds each. They are all 1080px high and @ 300 resolution. To be precise the respective widths and times are as follows: Title 2727px, 33.4 seconds duration; Slide A is 8146px wide, 20.75 seconds; Slide B is 6691px wide, 26.25 duration and Slide C is 6554px wide, 21.6 sec duration. (There is no vertical movement - it's set to 0.0 on every keyframe.) I have tried juggling them in in all sorts of ways but I can't find out how to stop this very irritating stutter which seems to occur as they accelerate. CoPilot has given me all sorts of advice which doesn't seem to make total sense! Any thoughts please? There is some urgency as I want to submit this sequence for a forthcoming competition.

Not much of a user of the forum, though a very intensive user of PTE nowadays, I hope I'm in the right area! I find the facility which links a sound file to a slide very helpful when things get complex, as they are doing with me now. Without it things would soon go hopelessly out of synch! I'd like to suggest (I think I've mentioned it before) a simple change to the number (light blue on a white square) which appears on the sound file when it's linked to a slide. Could it please be in a more conspicuous colour (I would suggest white out of red as a good visible combination.) In parallel with this, could I suggest a warning message when you remove a slide from the timeline, to flag up that there's one or more sound files linked to it. I have often lost bits of my soundtracks because I failed to notice that the sound had disappeared along with the picture!

The results of the RPS Twenty-Second International AV Festival, Cheltenham 24-25 September 2016 are available here: http://www.ibateman.co.uk/rps/results.html Andrew N Gagg FRPS, Secretary to the Festival

Dave, thanks. If I'm honest, this didn't work for me as you wrote it, but I do now know that copying and pasting gives me what I wanted. Still wouln't mind a 'one-click' control for this though... Ta! ANG

I hope I have not missed something that covers this already (if so, apologies) but here's my wish: I sometimes make mistakes in O&A when importing a new image - if I haven't taken care (don't say it) I may have an object selected when I import the new one, with the consequence that the new image appears as a child of the one accidentally left selected. It would be good to be able to change the status of the 'child' to correct this without deleting and then re-importing it. Similarly I might sometimes change my method for a particular bit of animation in some way, when the same kind of need arises. (The 'child' might have had quite a bit of work done to it, which I might not want to discard.) Any thoughts...?

'Never!' 'What, NEVER?' 'Weell... hardly ever.' (W.S. Gilbert. HMS Pinafore)

Thanks MUR - I'm about to try this out! Looks like a useful interim solution. I suppose the technique will also work for just the latter part of a track or tracks that need moving en bloc...? photoflora

I'm hoping some of the following are not too late to make it into the next edition: I keep thinking it would be handy to have a marker on the timeline in O&A which I could set (maybe more than one) which doesn’t do anything except sit there without moving, as an aid to synchronising different bits of animation. At the moment I do it using the figures in the blue boxes associated with the keypoints, but static markers which could be placed and then removed as required would be a real help – quicker and more intuitive.... Could filenames which have had only ‘subsidiary’ use (i.e. in Objects and Animations) also be shown in bold, or better still apply some other distinguishing feature such as a different colour, or show in italics, or both. Ideally two different typographical characteristics could show when it has been used in both situations – ‘main’ and ‘subsidiary’. (I think I have offered this before, and I believe others have made similar suggestions, so... “Pretty Please” Igor!). Could we have a facility for moving all the sound files ‘en bloc’. As an example of the need, I have nearly finished a very complex sequence, but have not put a sufficiently long black frame at the start. If I want to increase its length I have to shuffle all the sound files along, in all the different tracks, each independently of the other. This could easily cause problems with some of the quite critical bits of sound that have been very precisely synchronised with a particular image or animation. Again I think this has been suggested already, but I’d like to add my voice. Files with long names, especially sound files can look very much alike, as they are truncated when the icon size is small. Peter Appleton (pers. comm.) has reminded me that the full path of the currently highlighted file appears at the bottom of the screen, but could the filename be made a bit more conspicuous please – I’ve been using PTE for years, and failed to notice it! (Yes... okay! Don’t say it!)

Christmas has come early this year! I simply couldn’t wait to start using the full version of PicturesToExe v8... I’ve been a fan of PTE for a long while now. I can’t remember exactly when I first discovered it – it must be almost a decade ago – but over the years it has been a continuing revelation. I always hankered after making Audio-Visuals ‘the old way’, with tape-decks and multiple projectors, but I had neither the resources nor the skill and patience to take it up (besides being too busy with my job as a Production Designer with BBCtv). It’s no exaggeration to say that at last I’ve found my medium – since my RPS Fellowship it’s been a total change of direction, and the mainstay of my photography. I have used ‘the alternative software’ (naming no names!) in parallel with it, while running an A-V group for the Worcestershire Camera Club, but eventually gave it up, as there was no comparison with the straightforward way in which PTE works, and riding two horses at once was a balancing act I just couldn’t perform! However, as my current group of students are happily discovering, PTE gives you total control, at whatever level you are – easy to make a start, and equally easy to produce any effect you could possibly wish for as experience grows. It’s a not particularly surprising fact that the majority of people who enter the competitions I judge are using PTE in preference to any other software, and my own competition entries are crowned with at least modest success now and again, thanks in no small measure to the subtleties of PTE. Integrating audio into the main timeline, together with those volume controls is the cherry on top of a wonderful cake, and apart from making some of the special cursors a wee bit easier to handle, I can’t think what else you might do Igor – it’s difficult to improve on perfection! Though I quite understand the need, I hope the commercial pressure for novelty in the future won’t produce too many bells and whistles that may be attractive as USPs but potentially constitute a distraction from the real business of audio-visual – the telling of a good story. I don’t post much on the forum generally but in this case, I felt I just had to say “Thankyou Igor, for the very bestest Christmas present a boy could possibly wish for!”. Andrew N. Gagg FRPS Worcester, U.K., December 2013

Hello all! Thanks for your responses - Reassuring to know that several of you now confirm this - I feel a bit like the kid who saw Santa, and finally got everyone to believe him! Seriously though, it would be good (and useful) to get to the bottom of this little mystery. I think possibly we need the help of the programmers to explain it and maybe, if it is just a bug, sort it out. I have noticed the problem for quite a long time now (several years/versions I believe). Perhaps our plea for another marker (I've suggested Bold Italic) for pics entered via O&A could be answered at the same time. So as I said, "Pretty Please Igor"! When I can put some more words together, I want to ask about the feasibility of PTE tracking down pictures that it thinks are 'lost' ('blue screens'). I know this issue has been discussed before, but perhaps someone could indicate to me what the latest conclusions on the subject were, please. Thanks everyone for your supportive responses - much appreciated! PhotoFlora

DaveGee, thanks! I maybe wasn't clear enough in the first part of my post...? (The second half Gary has appreciated exactly - see my reply - so I reckon that settles that bit. Please Igor...) I'm hoping someone knows what happens to cause slides that have been 'emboldened' (good word that! :)/> ) by insertion into the time line (as main objects of course) to become 'un-emboldened' <_</> , although they are still part of the (main) sequence. As I said, it seems to happen to sequences that have had a 'history' - is it maybe a change of project name? I don't know and prefer not to guess - I'm requesting an authoritative answer after all... As far as putting used pics into another sub-folder, I'd be very reluctant to do this. I have been a fan of Barry Beckham's 'four-folder' system ever since I started (who's counting how long?) For clarity, I mean folders for: 1. sounds, 2. projects, 3. raw image storage and 4. pictures for show (and maybe a fifth one for documents like the script and any research info.). To complicate this system with a sub-folder for used pictures might in my case at least lead to all sorts of problems - let's face it, PTE does have trouble keeping track of components if they get moved around (but that's rather another issue), and so as an intuitive worker I do have to discipline myself to stay tidy! I keep insisting to my students to look after their 'housekeeping' too, and to stick to a simple system along those lines, and mostly they don't get into a mess if they do... In any case, I may well want to use my pics more than once, and I do like the bold device, if only it were a bit more consistent... Thanks in anticipation! PhotoFlora

Gary, thanks for yours - you have hit the (second) nail right on the head - that's exactly what I was requesting - how about bold italics as a distinguishing mark? 'Pretty Please' Igor! Nobody yet has come up with the reason for images becoming 'un-bolded', even when they haven't been removed from the sequence. I'm sure it has something to do with sequences of mine that have had a history that is in some way less than straightforward, but I don't know any more - I bet somebody out there does though...! Thanks Guys! Photoflora

I posted this elsewhere earlier, but maybe it's been missed... In certain circumstances (I'm not sure precisely which - can anyone tell me please?) the bold face titling disappears from the pictures that have been used in a project. This means that this (very useful) guide to what's been used and what's not becomes inaccurate. Would it be possible to link the 'bold' facility more permanently, or do I mean closely, to what's in the timeline and the 'slides' list? Secondary to this, would it be possible to make some other distinguishing mark for files that have been used as 'added images' in Objects & Animations? (At present of course they look as if they haven't been used...) Thanks in anticipation... PhotoFlora