-
Posts
683 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Posts posted by JudyKay
-
-
I have a recurring problem; I sometimes have photos in different folders by the same name coming from my lightroom catalog. The result is that I cannot create a Zip archive because of filename duplication. While the following solution is not ideal, I find myself sometimes wishing I could simply rename all the files from within PTE to resolve this problem--or at least rename the problem files.
My current project has 420 slides in 10 sets of about 40 images. To rename all those files a folder at a time and then to figure out how to sort them is a lot of work. I don't always care (with notable exceptions if updates are likely) how files are named once imported to PTE, so a way to mass rename would save me a lot of time.
Or perhaps someone already has a workable solution for this?For now, I am renaming files in original folders and re-importing and sorting in PTE.
Note: I don't always realize i have duplicate names until I try to save or backup after a lot of work is done.
-
Thanks for sharing. I know that region of the world well.
-
Hmmm. I like that. Thanks.
-
Touching memorial. Thanks for sharing.
-
Very nice! Thanks.
-
You have a 16 MB file size limit. I create mini-videos (15 MB to stay under 16 MB) and sent a series.
-
This one?
-
Very nice. Thanks!
-
I like what you did there.
-
On 5/22/2020 at 6:41 AM, nelson said:
I have said this before, we are so fortunate to have you back Dom! Your creativity is beyond words.
Kieron
Agreed!
-
Hmmm. The video is private?
-
I know your work is always outstanding, and even then, each template is surprisingly beyond what I anticipated. Thank you!
-
Thanks! Outstanding as always.
-
I have a friend who is scanning hundreds of priceless old Asian slides. He uses a camera on a tripod and a hand-made black cardboard frame in a box taped to his window. I told him he was crazy and all the reasons why (imperfections in the glass window, clouds, color, bird flying by). He showed me the images.
Stunning.
His setup was free. His worry was that neighbors would think he was operating a spy device.
-
On 4/8/2020 at 7:54 PM, goddi said:
Greetings Judy,
Thanks for the info. I took a look at the scanner you mentioned. The problem is that I have about 7,000 slides already in Kodak carousels. And a few thousand in sleeves and boxes. To take them out and run them though a scanner manually would be a tough job. I'm looking into a scanner that will scan using the carousels. And will let me use the Kodak Stack Loader for my loose slides. I'd appreciate your opinion on this type of scanner I found.
I found the SlideSnap Pro. It is expensive ($3,450) and I'd have to buy a 90mm macro lens to go with my Nikon7100 DSLR. I like it but really too expensive. But if last resort, I might convince myself that it would be the only way I'd get it done:
http://slidesnappro.com/product/slidesnap-pro/
But, I found a place that rents a similar setup, and includes the camera. So basically, ready to go. Three-days, $325; Five-days $450. Cheaper, relatively, but nothing additionally needed. Only thing is the pressure to get it done in the 3 or 5 days.
https://services.ezphotoscan.com/home/
I'd appreciate it if you can give an opinion on this method of scanning since you're an experienced scanner. About the same price as buying the Plustek but leaving all the slides in the carousels would be a less traumatic process. And once done, I wouldn't need the scanner anymore. Just not sure of the quality of the digitized slides.
Thanks... Gary
Your situation might be different than mine. I had some loose slides, slides in older types of carousels and many of the slides in Kodak-type carousels were "sticky" warped with age, humidity or something. I did not return slides to the carousels but did keep them in order and re-boxed and labeled. I would strongly consider the method you found if I had 1000's of slides in good condition in good carousels.
The plustek software is very good as mentioned above and will save a lot of Lightroom / Photoshop (or whatever) work. There is sizable learning curve to get best results. Not every slide has to be best. Now and then you come across some incredible image that is worth a lot of labor and knowing how to capture it at is best is worth the work. -
I and two associates have approximately 40,000 (?? I think) slides and negatives scanned with this (or a previous model):
https://www.amazon.com/2PX0321-Plustek-OpticFilm-8200i-Scanner/dp/B009724JZYIt's not perfect but with some experience is a good way to process 1000's. One model is about worn out but still works. The second new one is going strong.
-
I have done a lot of scanning and found no consistent way around hand cropping. You get the best job that way. Might depend how important good cropping is. In my experience, nearly all photos need some post-scan processing anyway. Dust. Color. Fuzz on the edge of a slide. Fingerprints on film. Makes me grimace to think of it.
-
5 hours ago, jt49 said:
Wouldn't it be fine to have blending options in PTE which could be applied to animated images?
I think it is inevitable.
-
Blending modes are fundamental to layering images or videos. I see it as necessary to PTE moving forward.
-
Commonly used, cheap, well time-tested and available around the world. Used for Lupus as well. Known by the military for decades. We have a lot of hope.
-
Thanks for all that light!
-
Thanks for a good message and slideshow. Nature is always soothing and re-orients us to love others as they are, wherever they are.
-
Love the guitar work too. Who is it?
-
Based on your experience and how you describe what you would like to do, I recommend PTE AV Studio Pro.
Be sure to take a look here: https://www.wnsoft.com/en/pte-av-studio/compare/
Renaming files within PTE
in Suggestions for Next Versions
Posted
How about automatically appending the right-most folder name to a duplicate file name: [filename]_[LastFolderName].[ext]
Example:
Assume we have conflicting duplicate filenames from different folders like this:
Automatically rename the corresponding files during back-up like this:
That would indicate where the file came from and maintain recognizable integrity of the filename. Also, files would still sort normally.
A warning would be nice, so we have some idea that files have been renamed and will no longer exactly match the originals.