Jump to content
WnSoft Forums

PNG 8 or 24?


Peter S

Recommended Posts

Since seeing the discussion on "Save for web" in Photoshop I have been experimenting and found I can choose to save PNGs as PNG-8 or PNG-24. PNG-8 seems to produce very jagged outlines and I assume that when using the normal Save as function in Photoshop it chooses 24 automatically.

The PNG-8 files are about half the size of the PNG-24 but I can't see much use for them with the quality I seem to be getting.

I would be interested to know if anyone can suggest the best setting in Save for Web for PNGs.

Peter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The correct understanding of this answer is very important to me because I am about to embark on the most complicated P2E presentation I've ever done.

I can understand the advantage PNG24 gives quality wise over PNG8, but I am confused about the comment concerning 24-bit BMP. Are you saying 24-bit BMP loads twice as fast as PNG24?

:blink:

Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dave,

We don't include PNG images to created EXE file of a slide show.

Instead this, we decompress PNG image to BMP image and compress this file to ZIP archive. This ZIP file will be embedded to EXE file of your slide show. No losses in quality. But such converted images load faster in slide show. File size also very small, like PNG.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With all due respect, if you find a particular setting for saving PNGs doesn't give the quality you require then the answer surely is to use the setting that suits your purposes the best? As Bruce has said, JPGs work well for the main images but as for PNGs - at the end of the day, only you can be the judge of what quality you want in your finished sequence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't mean to turn this into a "what format is the best" conversation.

What I am interested in is this comment from admin1:

"But such converted images load faster in slide show."

What format is the "such" format? I'm interested in making such I'm not making P2E work harder to produce a fine presentation than it has to.

Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would venture to guess that the vast majority of PTE users rely on JPG files for their shows unless there is some special purpose or need (eg, transparency). I have to believe that if there was a better format that reduced loading in PTE and produced a better, smoother, more reliable show then we'd all be using a different format. If I'm incorrect I'd sure like to learn the "better way".

Best regards,

Bruce

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But such converted images load faster in slide show.

That mean that the internal compressed and lossless format is quicker to decompressed than PNG (Just a little more than JPG).

If you use BMP without compress it, the file will be heavier but there will be no time for decompression.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...