Jump to content
WnSoft Forums

davegee

Advanced Members
  • Posts

    9,223
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    47

Everything posted by davegee

  1. Original poster probably meant pixels anyway!! DaveG
  2. Bill, When you resize in PS all you need do is change the HEIGHT to 768. You could set up a Batch Process to change the HEIGHT only to 768 for all images . That would then cater for both Landscape and Portrait formats. This assumes that you have all images in the original format and that the original format is a multiple of 1024x768. If you have a DSLR then the format is possibly 1024x681 in which case the height you set would be 681 and your images would display a black line top and bottom of your 1024x768 screen. DaveG
  3. For all you good people who are into Freeware to assist you in construction of your PTE Shows here is an interesting link to a lot of Free software (linkcourtesy of someone over at Nikonians.com). http://www.photo-freeware.net/category-downloads.php If there is anything you know of which is not listed at this site feel free to mention it in this thread for any interested parties. DaveG
  4. Hi Lin, Your show worked OK on my machine but I will test it on my Laptop later - Pro Show normally will not work on my Laptop (no problems with PTE). It will be interesting to see what happens with this one. In the meantime, please advise: What resolution is the optimum for this show? Skies are pretty badly pixelated on my 1280x1024 LCD Monitor as though it were a 1024x768 show which has been configured to "fit to screen". It also appears to me that some of the zooms are "over-cooked"? By this I mean that, in the zooms, the images seem to be too small to allow zooming in to fill the 1280x1024 screen and then zoom out by a factor of 2 or three. To do this the image would have to be at least 2560 or even 3840 wide to get the same quality throughout the zoom. Not criticisms - just trying to get a feel for the technology in readiness! DaveG
  5. I can sympathise with both points of view here, but hasn't I gor said that if you don't use the Pan and Zoom then Ver. 5 will work quite happily as before? Too much Pan and Zoom is going to have me reaching for my vertigo pills! DaveG
  6. No problems up to 100Meg shows on Pentium 4, 3Gig laptop with 512Mb Ram and NVIDIA card. DaveG P.S. The symptoms you describe sound as though you have transitions too close together - could it be that they will run on higher spec machines but falter if the spec drops because of the transitions and not because of the file size?
  7. Yes, Stand -alone is not a problem. All you will need is an e-mail account to recieve the registration key. DaveG
  8. Hi Jeff, Yes, I did say "if your mini-disc has an optical output" - however the UA-1EX will also take normal line input (I think) to USB which is ideal in the case of laptops. Check the spec before buying. DaveG
  9. As long as the images do not exceed the Window measurements in PTE there is no need to go to PS - the PTE background image will do. DaveG
  10. Perhaps I am missing something in the question. However, the answer depends on the means of getting the collected information to the customer. If it is going to be viewed on a monitor, what is the resolution of the monitor? For instance my existing monitor is 1280x1024 so that is what I am currently cropping to. If you have a mixture of Lansdcape and Portrait formats then the Landscape material should be no more than 1280 wide and the Portrait material no more than 1024 high. If the customer is going to use a projector, what is the resolution of the projector? Chances are it will be 1024x768, in which case these are the figures to work to. Also, if this is the case the computer/laptop should be set to the same res as the projector for best results. If you don't have to fill the frame then you could use any aspect ratio which fits inside the monitor/projector resolution. However if all material has to fill the frame then your monitor/projector resolution will give you the aspect ratio you are looking for. Hope that is what you were looking for? DaveG
  11. Hi Jeff, The device I use is an EDIROL UA-1D which has apparently been superceded by the UA-1EX (more and better facilities). More details can be found at: http://www.edirol.it/europe/details.asp?ct...&la=UK&code=409 The RRP is £69 but worth every penny if you have an optical output that you want to route into your laptop etc. It needs no external power supply - powered by USB. You will need an optical cable in addition which, if you don't already own one, will bump the price up by around £20. Prices in the USA are probably 50% of what I quoted above - the price we have to pay for living here! DaveG
  12. Hi Jeannight, I have posted this elsewhere and previously: If your Sony has an OPTICAL output, EDIROL make an OPTICAL to USB converter which will allow you to input directly into Audacity / Audition / EZCD Creator etc. in real time. It is a simple matter to then to save as a WAV or convert to MP3. If you intend to link more than one file together be sure to save as WAV file and create your linked file from a group of WAV files (not a group of MP3 files). If you decide to go down this route I'll talk you through it and not provide you with links etc or rude suggestions. DaveG
  13. Tim, This has been discussed many times. Igor has, I think, promised that the next version will allow "back to back" transitions but for now allow around 300ms beteween transitions. DaveG
  14. I would like to be able to see the items added in the Object Editor in the "Light Table" view. DaveG
  15. I mentioned this as a suggestion for the next version, Ken. To be able to see the text that has been added to a slide, blank or otherwise, without having to go into the object editor......... DaveG
  16. I'm pretty sure that your 1024x768 show will project OK but on the Laptop it might appear as a "stretched" show. I get wierd effects on a widescreen laptop when projecting Powerpoint shows but the Projected Image is OK. My opinion? - stay away from widescreen Laptops for this purpose unless you are sure it will do what you want. DaveG
  17. Hi Ian, I'm not 100% sure of the facts here but I think, to be able to do what you suggest ("converting the original PTE AVI file to Mpeg instead"), it would have to be done in the interim stage where the AVI is still a "Temp" file. I have tried in the past, to copy the temp file to a different location but this does not work. Any thoughts? DaveG
  18. Thanks Ken, I was looking for a recommendation - I have been through the search processes and remain confused. DaveG
  19. Hi bjc, Can you recommend a good dual graphics card (for PC)? DaveG
  20. Hi Tim, This will probably be of no help at all to you but it is interesting that I (and a host of other people I know) get exactly the same problem with shows created in Pro Show Gold. I tried and rejected the programme a long time ago for exactly that reason. After intensive research a group of us came to the conclusion that it was not worth pursuing and have used PTE ever since. I am not suggesting that you change your programme but wish you luck in finding the solution. If you do, please post it so that we can see here if the same problem is preventing us from viewing PSG shows? Upgrading to SP2 did not change our problem one way or the other. DaveG P.S. Many thanks to whoever transferred my "old account" details to my "new account" details i.e. number of posts etc.
  21. Patrick. It is an option when you log in - to the right of the log-in. If you are logging in automatically you will have to log out and then back in - but be sure that you know your password before doing this? DaveG
  22. For some reason, when all the changes took place, I was asked for my user name and password to enter the forum and, of course, I had forgotten my password. In spite of Igor taking a personal interest I have been unable to recover my original account, so daveg is now davegee. It is not worth pursuing this as it will take up valuable time which could be better spent on other things. davegee
  23. Richhaas, Having just purchased a 1280x1024 monitor I have some sympathy with your dilemna. Up to the purchase of the monitor my shows have always been 1024x768 but the advantages of the extra resolution outweigh any other considerations so what to do? Allowing "fit to screen" is not an option for older shows as resulting image degradation is not acceptable so for those I do as you do: 1024x768 in a window or make the show 1280x1024 and show the 1024x768 images over a plain black 1280x1024 background. But this only works if you have no panoramas i.e. push transitions otherwise there is a vertical black line between images in the push. Re-doing the panoramas at 1280 width is a good solution if there are not too many of them and you can accept the jump in size. From now on (until I purchase a monitor with higher resolution) I'm working at 1280x851 for images (to take advantage of full width for panoramas) on a 1280x1024 background for my own uses and producing a 1024x768 show in a window in addition for those still using that format. Cropping images to fit screen formats is not the answer because it makes batch processing difficult/impossible. DaveG
  24. Hi, The Forum is still loading VERY slowly and the "Forgotten Password" function is still not working? I get a message saying that an e-mail has been sent but it never arrives - anyone else? DaveGee (DaveG)
×
×
  • Create New...