denisb Posted August 9, 2015 Report Share Posted August 9, 2015 Hello,on a specific slideshow, with a kind of time-lapse and zoom, there was a lack of fluidity (jump).I made a small example (100 jpeg pictures) to estimate roughly the minimum slide duration needed.With my PC (2009):Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300 @ 2.50GHz1024MB GeForce GT 220 (MSI)Windows 7 64 bitsThe minimum slide duration is 0.19 s for jpeg pictures 1920x1080 (374 ko)For an up to date PC(2015):INTEL Core i7 4790K Unlocked 4.0Ghz LGA 1150RAM DDR3 - 32 GoGeForce GTX980 G1.Gaming SOC 4G2 x SSD PLEXTOR M6Pro Xtrem Series 256GB PlexTurboWindows 8.1 64 BitsThe minimum duration is 0.25 sYou can see (in French) examples : http://www.diapositif.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=39300&start=0It show that the problem is PTE slideshow on Windows 8.1 OS.The slideshow is attached. Select the time duration and look at the progress bar.RegardsDenisSpeed_test_PTE.zip Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lin Evans Posted August 9, 2015 Report Share Posted August 9, 2015 On my Windows 8.4 64 bit OS with an i7 4770 CPU (8 CPU's) @ 3.40 GHZ and 32768 MB RAM Direct X 11 and a GeFprce GTx 760 with 2 Gigabytes RAM 192 bit running on a 30" 2650x1600 pixel display, the .30 and .25 are smooth and others all jerky.On my Win XP Home Edition with a Core 2 DUO 2.33 GHZ with maximum RAM (4 gigabytes installed) and a good GeForce GTX 750 Ti with also 2 gigabytes RAM running Direct X 9.0c. None are completely smooth. .30 hiccups a bit and the others all jerk.Best regards,Lin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Yachtsman1 Posted August 9, 2015 Report Share Posted August 9, 2015 I don't have Windows 8, but for test purposes, on W7 Professional, the top item was jerky, the rest smooth.My PC-Intel® Core™i5 Quad Core Processor i5-4570 (3.2GHz) 6MB CacheMotherboard ASUS® MAXIMUS VI IMPACT: Mini-ITX, LG1150, USB 3.0, SATA 6GBs,WIFIMemory (RAM) 16GB KINGSTON DUAL-DDR3 1600MHz (2 x 8GB)Graphics Card 2GB NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 760 - 2 DVI, HDMI, DP - 3D Vision ReadyMemory - 1st Hard Disk 1TB WD CAVIAR BLACK WD1002FAEX, SATA 6 Gb/s, 64MB CACHE(7200rpm)2nd Hard Disk 1TB 3.5" SATA-III 6GB/s HDD 7200RPM 32MB CACHE1st DVD/BLU-RAY Drive 24x DUAL LAYER DVD WRITER ±R/±RW/RAMPower Supply CORSAIR 650W ENTHUSIAST SERIES™ MODULAR TXM-650 V2-80PLUS®Processor Cooling INTEL STANDARD CPU COOLERSound Card ONBOARD 6 CHANNEL (5.1) HIGH DEF AUDIO (AS STANDARD)Wireless/Wired Networking 10/100/1000 GIGABIT LAN PORT - AS STANDARD ON ALL PCsUSB Options MIN. 2 x USB 3.0 & 4 x USB 2.0 PORTS @ BACK PANEL + MIN. 2FRONT PORTSDVD Recovery Media Windows 7 Professional (64-bit) DVD with paper sleeve.Back in a week .Yachtsman1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Igor Posted August 10, 2015 Report Share Posted August 10, 2015 Denis,Thanks for this question. PicturesToExe is not optimized to show quickly series of large images in the executable format.0.2 or 0.3 second is not enough interval to load JPEG images (1920x1080) in time. The practical limit may vary from computer to computer. And that problem will occur on any version of Windows.For time lapse, I recommend to create MP4 video. The file will be very small due to good optimization. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
denisb Posted August 10, 2015 Author Report Share Posted August 10, 2015 Igor,I agree that the value itself 0.2 or 0.3 s is good enough and the example is just to évaluate the time needed.The real slideshow was with larger image (zoom effect) each second.The surprise was that the time under windows 8.1 is larger than the time needed under windows 7.I don't know why, but i suppose you know.Denis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.