Ghulya

A decent film nothing more: Pte (Platinum Wings M.object and other) is d-i-f-f-e-r-e-n-t ecosystem for "slides" but in "movement". Still images with pan zoom fade etc. D-i-f-f-e-r-e-n-t of a movie or television. Slideshow, in other hand, as a Classic Chamber Music, different other musical "gender". Final Cut, for example, for movimaker. Pte and similar, again, for photographers. D-i-f-f-e-r-e-n-t way for show. D-i-f-f-e-r-e-n-t emotion because the "still" image from eye arrive at soul directly as an Espresso d-i-f-f-e-r-e-n-t other beverage named "coffee". D-i-f-f-e-r-e-n-t the word around the World of homologated people. Homologated emotion. Homologated life: life? Good one, eh! Ghulya photographer since 1969

I think the new born photographers not understand (deliberate they do not understand?) big difference from “movie” or "brodcast television" and a “slideshow" is it a stellar difference. Why? Simply because the human psicology of attention is different, again, of a movie or streaming in 24/25 fps more or less. Slideshow ( never Power-Point or Keynote ) built of strategy of total emotion on “fix” image, in dissolvence fade in-fade out (phantom named third image). Images fix and fit-in consciuse and in-consciuse. In other hand the power, impossible for movie and television, of slide show is it innate "fascinazione" (The medium is the message, McLuhan) and with a great track soud is impossible, again, for other media. Remember i-m-p-o-s-s-i-b-l-e. Only "static photos" make a miracle like a Genesis. And time of show as international rule for projection is max 15'. After this time "fall" attention of spectators. PTE Exe (Platium Wings, M.objects and other) is not Final Cut Premiere or Da Vinci and more. Cinema oops slideshow? Like an Italian caffé or pure Rite (PTE Exe) and water with drops of caffeine...american coffee (FINAL CUT AND ETC). Taste? No, essence of life with allure. Ps. For a “slideshow” as a episode in movie/television scrren script is NECESSARY a storyboard (I wrote in the past to Staff Pte for a "report" project as Excell images-text-sounds-effetcs-time or exactly a french old program avec allure to make a storyboard/screen play for a big show). Only this step is itpossible a "godibile" show. Pss. Here a slideshow (court métrage?) with less than ten images/ shoot; in the case patience if write italian because I make it for to denounce a case of Mafia in Heritage italian (in Italy exists not only Colosseum...) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uE5mV2C6Ido Ghulya photographer since 1969

In medio stat virtus? Ok I agree Regards Ghulya

Good view point Lin. But I remember, more or less, when in New York the Advertising iPhone 6 was on wall, perfect for capturing attention any person. Dpi or resolution full frame or Hasselblad file 200 400 800 Megapixel or NASA computers farm? No, absolutly because the phisiology human eye at long distance not distinguish MTF lines as a god lens. Human eye is different, for this reason ins't necessary bilion of pixel for a great poster (comunication an emotion). My case I make a "tiny" wall poster adversiting large mt 6 x 3 from a Camedia file Olympus Point&Shoot: wow! Digital is different, too. Again "resolution"? Other case: my printed art from service in Milan Italy on Hahnemühle Photo Rag cm 30 x40, classic format for gallery in Anaolgic Era. Wow! Bingo! Perfect for wall exposition: but pay attention at distance and not nose on photo! Finaly an description (for a magazine) how to I explain to make a still life at hause with only window light soft: Epson 850Z of 2.1 milion pixel printed in A4 vertical at 220 Dpi offset. Bingo! In other hand more pixel is a Propaganda of Major brand(y)... "Whats the use of having a great depth of field if there is not an adequate depth of feeling?” Change depth in megapixel-resolution and quote of Great Eugene Smith, remains same Immortal. My personal point of view in half century experienced, from Analogic to Digital Era. Regards Ghulya

Thanks again. But firstly I start like photographer since1969 Analogic Era: yes exactly half century ago. Secondly all people, see statistics, in the World use night and day smartphone iOS or Androind platform: bilion of users.Consequently all content “multimedia” photo short film, music games search and email sharing is made on smartphone and insignificat share of tablet (from Medieval Latin tabuleta diminutive of tabula). The progress of smartphone is like a monster. Note for example that (young) directors use on smartphone Filmic Pro, on Apple tablet iPad LumaFuison* or Affinfinity app as Photoshop for retouche “on the road”. Why? Because Future is here with smartphone: Sic transit gloria mundi. Best regards Man Ps. Please note I use again an “old” Camedia Olympus C-8080 and C-5050 a perfect tiny camera as Leica style (cameras used to Alex Majoli italian reporter of Magnum Agency**). Four-thirds "old" E1 and E3 or E510 with Zuiko lens. However more my photos, in this time, is make with an other “old” tool named iPhone 4 in reason that I wrote * Fast Video Editing on the iPad Pro with LumaFusion https://www.cinema5d.com/fast-video-editing-ipad-pro-lumafusion/ ** Alex Majoli points and shoots http://www.robgalbraith.com/multi_page8c1c.html?cid=7-6468-7844

I re-write again no problem: first you said (wrote on Pdf) "more" pixel for "best" photos? Well and what in pixel: 10 20 30 40...500 Magapixel for a perfect pictures? Secondly all people around the world see, watch the "multimedia" content as Jepg on tiny smartphone diagonal: are you capable to dsitinguish if taken from 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9..bilion megapixel of a XYZ digital camera? If yes are you eyes a microscope? Best regards Ghulya

Thanks for info, but please explain me where is write (Photographic Holy Bible?) for a good (perfect?) picture we necessary Bilion of megapixel, when at this time all viewers use a smartphone? In other hand have you possibility on smartphne (Dtp more or less is obsolete, right?) to note difference from: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9...megapixel of difference shoot to shoot? Have you a microscope for eyes? In many case, when i send photos on Getty Images, more it is only 1600 x 1200 pixel...Thanks for reply Best regards Ghulya

A good idea + 1 Ghulya

Thanks

In Pte v. 9.0 xyz, both in View slide o and Timeline, if on slide I make editing like color toning contrast etc, and I want to replicate these settings for other slides, I would have to start every time: each to each A Copy / Past command peculiarity, for example, exist it even in Premiere Elements, where in fact, if on a clip I apply the color toning contrast etc, with a simple (again Copy / Paste effects at menu) I can apply it with a clik to all clips that I want. Not in Pte: problem solved for next upgrade? Regards Ghulya

++

Thanks

Thanks but my 7.5 was on crashed computer and not remember key code Man Ps. For Support Team, again, please note the email support don't work

First all excuse me but the email don't work Dear I am an old customer from 7.5. So, if possible, I would like to buy a new "extended" version 9: with discount or isn't possible? Best regards Man info@manunzio.it Ps. My daily computer run on Windows 8.1

Errare humanum est, perseverare autem diabolicum I seen new Help online (in my case italian) but is a perfect calque of previous one Pte 8. Nothing (screen example menu etc) new interface O&A as multiple track etc. Strictly speaking: is 8 or new 9 version the "help italian" with images that I see? Above all, the painful notes, literaly, the program inteface: possible in AD 2017, Is a children elementary school book? Nothing doing, and nothing possibility to change “color” of interface: gray, light,middle, black or semi balck. In other hand as professional Editor, Lightroom, Platinum...or Proshow Pro, for example. And rudimental “editor” of text? Proshow for example is stellar A pletora of sound track/s commentary but, again but only track for video-photo: Premiere Elements, in this case is stellar for example. Sure Premiere ad others is “only” editor video, but with Ken Burns...that I have experimented for many time and very capable: Pte is different, but monorail. Inevitable. Finaly a this time a question irreversible: Pte 9.0 is a tool for amateurs or serious pro-semipro-master...professional? If affermative I think the next 9..x is imperative: 1) editor text decent 2) multitrack video-photo 3) inteface etc. Regards Ghulya

Regards

Memento No I dont' used “to strip off the flesh” or Saracsm. But, please note, in my case only Irony, that is different. Intelligenti pauca verba "Figure of speech in which the intended meaning is the opposite of the literal meaning" (usually covert sarcasm under a serious or friendly pretense), c. 1500, from Latin ironia, from Greek eironeia "dissimulation, assumed ignorance," from eiron "dissembler," perhaps related to eirein "to speak," from PIE *wer-yo-, suffixed form of root *were- (3) "to speak" (see verb). Used in Greek of affected ignorance, especially that of Socrates, as a method of exposing an antagonist's ignorance by pretending to modestly seek information or instruction from him. Thus sometimes in English in the sense "simulated ignorance." For nuances of usage, see humor (n.). In early use often ironia. Figurative use for "condition opposite to what might be expected; contradictory circumstances; apparent mockery of natural or expected consequences" is from 1640s, sometimes distinguished as irony of fate or irony of circumstances. Related: Ironist. A verb ironize "speak ironically" is recorded from c. 1600”. http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&search=irony “1570s, sarcasmus, from Late Latin sarcasmus, from late Greek sarkasmos "a sneer, jest, taunt, mockery," from sarkazein "to speak bitterly, sneer," literally "to strip off the flesh," from sarx (genitive sarkos) "flesh," properly "piece of meat," from PIE root *twerk- "to cut" (source also of Avestan thwares "to cut"). Current form of the English word is from 1610s. For nuances of usage, see humor (n.).” http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=sarcasm

And new 9,0 when is scheduled in months or years? Thanks

Uhm ...not exactly, WnSoft support scheduled (from e mail) the date December 2015, postquam January 2016 or in February 2016 ...or. What problem/s? I don't thiks as lunch of Shuttle for Mars in the 2XYZ futurible century.... Regards

.............

Question: not said WnSoft version nine, would seen something in summer? And here is August : a short movie or screen shots on new feature? Da Campos

Good idea a utility that is missing in Pte: the print from the program ALL objects, time in out, fade in out, music etc of any project as ultimate storyboard. A useful to be “investigate” without need or see each time the executable and / or preview. We we asked for some time, for professional use. But “Nemo propheta in patria” or No man is a prophet in his own country, exactly like Pte devoted people. Da Campos

November 12 A.D. (Anno Domini) 2014 and on horizon line not new version 8.XYZ. Why? Best regards Da Campos

Good idea!