davegee

** So a few things do not add up. You're right Ralph. 512Mb card here - 1920x1200 Monitor - 1920x1200 project. No hesitation on any of the three settings. P.S. I transfered the whole project above from my desktop to my laptop with 64Mb graphics card and got the same symptoms as you. Altering the Windows HA did nothing for me. The hesitation (STOP) always occurs at the beginning of a transition. Are we back to the graphics card and its RAM? DaveG

Jim, Here is a link that Ken found which is worth a read. http://support.riverdeep.net/techtips_detail.asp?id=116 I don't know how practical their last suggestion is?? DaveG

I can't say that I have a lot of enthusiasm for this suggestion Barry. The USED images are in BOLD text, as you know, and the unused ones in normal text so I don't find it difficult to find "new" ones. However, if Igor could build it in as a SWITCHABLE OPTION - why not. DaveG

Not having that problem but: Clutching at straws! If it is OLD was it created in a 5.5 BETA? What happens if it is opened in 5.5 final and SAVED before opening in 5.6 and saved? Use SAVE AS and a new name. DaveG

It might be that the two Hardware Acceleration settings were/are conflicting. DaveG

Jim, Have you tried the advice here: http://www.deskshare.com/Resources/article...celeration.aspx it does not seem likely but worth a try. DaveG

Hi Jim, Tests that I have conducted and reported on elsewhere here today, TEND to suggest that Graphics Card Memory has nothing to do with it. A laptop with an nVidia Graphics card with 64Mb of RAM handled everything I could throw at it AS LONG AS HARDWARE ACCELARATION was turned on. Without Hardware Accelaration nothing would work smoothly! DaveG

Deleted. Please remove your replies, all? DaveG

I'm glad that you found it! It's those shortcuts that can sometimes cause problems. I always use EDIT / FILL / BLACK. BTW - Ctrl + Del does nothing on my CS3 - is it standard or something that you have set up? I take that back - it is "Fill with background colour" - I was filling white on white and therefore it appeared to do nothing!! DaveG

Hi Barry, What are the black background and white letters? Is the black bg the PTE background or a JPG? Are the white letters generated in PTE or a PNG? I'll try to reproduce on my 1920x1200 if you give details. DaveG

I don't think that there is a way of actually LOCKING a slide to a fixed position. Maybe someone else will jump in? However, if you make your changes to timing issues ONLY in the timeline and not in CUSTOMISE slide, then any changes such as altering the durations of other slides and their transition times etc will not affect adjacent slides. Moving slides to the opposite side of the "FIXED" slide is obviously going to give you a problem. A cure for the SPECIFIC example you quoted might be to include all of the first five images in slide one (using keyframes to simulate slide transitions), make image six your slide two and make the duration of slide one 24 seconds. That way, as long as you don't alter the overall duration of slide one....... DaveG

In the TIMELINE view with Style 1 selected, the blue cursor moves along the timeline. In Style 2 the cursor stays in the middle of the display and the timeline scrolls along. The "Don't use Auto-Scrolling" seems to default to Style 1. DaveG

Jim, I have tried this again and still cannot duplicate your symptoms? The show I tried it with uses 1200 pixel high images (quality 12). Is anything going on in the background apart from PTE? There is no anti-virus or anything of that sort running on the machine I tried it with. It might be worth temporarily switching off anything of that sort and/or using Ken's favourite ENDITALL and try that? DaveG

Bearing in mind recent requests, nothing less than the MULTIDISPLAY version would suffice Eric! But you (sorry "I") have to agree with them: The unrelenting trend towards higher resolutions and best-possible quality is characterized by a multitude of HD films produced by high-quality recording devices and digital pictures from SLRs. Conventional video playing devices and their video quality, however, increasingly tend to fall short of the high quality generally expected for output and presentation. (Where have I heard that before?) But I'm not about to make the switch. And while I still have Audition/Audacity at my disposal I see no need of a mixing desk incorporated into PTE. Each to its own! DaveG Sorry Peter, we were typing at the same time!

I'm not sure that anyone has properly read what I suggested. I'll leave it to you guys. DaveG

Hi Eric, Point taken, but when you say: "If it was done as you suggest, there could be problems with camera/PC/projector capabilities."...... ... I thought that was the object of the excercise? What is the point in testing a projector, for instance, with a laptop which will only handle quality 8 or 10 images when a future purchase of a higher spec laptop will (possibly) show up problems that weren't previously seen? If the user's laptop will not cope with such a test show then it merely highlights the need for a new laptop as well as the intended projector purchase. Anyhow, all that is being suggested is a set of guidelines to construct a test show - if the user wishes to use a lower quality so be it. For my part, I'll continue to use 1200 pixel high, quality 12 images for viewing on my own monitor and TV as long as my desktop and laptop computers will perform without grumbling. Best wishes, DaveG

Jim, My suggestion was as a starting point for a set of "instructions" or "rules" which would allow anyone to construct his or her own show to test both laptop and projector. So taking your comments into consideration you would recommend that (presumably for a 1024x768 projector) one of the tests be a 15 second pan using a 3:1 image at full height? If you translate that into a formula for a 1920x1080 projector your suggestion becomes 3240x1080 (I said 3000+ x 1080) so I wasn't far out and I accept your suggestion of 15 seconds. The same figure for a 1400x1050 projector would be 15 seconds pan - 3000+ x 1050. I don't think that the width of the image would matter but I can see that the speed of the pan might. Would you agree on that as a starting point? Would you also agree on the importance of using a quality 12 image in order to provide the maximum "drain on resources" and eliminate another variable? DaveG

Instead of "someone" constructing a test show, why not (perhaps in a separate thread) assemble a set of "rules" which might be used to construct a taxing test show? Does there need to be more than one test show? One for 1024x768 projectors, one for 1400x1050 projectors and one for 1920x1080 projectors. For instance, and as a starting point, I see no point in testing a projector with images which are anything less than the full working resolution of the projector. They would also need to be quality 12 images (in Adobe speak). So, there is a starting point for testing a 1920x1080 projector for instance: A 1080 high and 3000+ pixels wide image saved at quality 12, panned in 30 seconds. For testing the 1050 and 768 high variants the images would be scaled down to suit. My computer would handle such a test - would a 1920x1080 projector connected to it via a HDMI cable do the same? DaveG

Just a minor point (possibly): The Canon sx-50 is equipped with DVI input - has anyone tried this? When connecting to my TV from my laptop there is a marked difference between the VGA and HDMI/DVI inputs. VGA is unsharp and gritty - HDMI is super-sharp and a clone of what I see on my laptop monitor. It's possible that you'll see the same if you connected the SX-50 from a laptop equipped with HDMI? DaveG

Brian, I have to say that I don't copy your experiences with shutting down / hibernation - whatever you care to call it. Many's the time I have gone out for the day and forgot to turn the darned thing off. I've come back 8-10 hours later and just hit the enter key and there it is. I don't advise it, but it happens - I've never experienced anything like you describe. So, in theory, what are we talking about? How many times do we do a scan and it finds absolutely nothing? Is it a huge problem, if on one overnight scan out of a hundred, that the machine stays on waiting for an answer? I think I'll give it a try and see what happens. My laptop's Power Scheme is configured for mains power and never switches off etc. Best wishes, DaveG

Not at all - I'm learning here. So if a problem is encountered and requires an action, presumably the scan would stay open on screen awaiting your decision in the morning? Otherwise it would close down? I don't really see that as a big problem - when I was gainfully employed I left my computer running sometimes for weeks on end with no adverse effects. Maybe that's a good idea? If you don't reboot you don't get any problems? But we have to be green don't we? DaveG

Hi both, I tried both Auto Scroll 1 and 2 and neither produced the symptoms you describe. Perhaps some details of your graphics card and its RAM would be helpful? Mine's a GeForce 7600 GS with 512Mb of RAM. By today's standards that's not as up-to-date as I would like but I don't want to risk disturbing anything by upgrading. DaveG

Hi Eric, If your intended late night scan kicks in too soon you could PAUSE the scan and RESUME on completion of your work. There is also another advanced option: "Delay this task if a full screen application is running". Acouple of other options: "Scan infectable files only" In "Scan process priority" change from Automatic to "Fast scan" Scan "C" drive only. One of my "pet foibles" is that my "C" drive contains NO DATA (other than data which programmes write during their operation and can't be re-directed elsewhere) and this minimises the scanning time. Hi Brian, I bow to your knowledge on all things computing and would ask a couple of questions to improve my knowledge: Firstly, if a late night scan is actioned would that not isolate the sneaky little Virus that is going to action itself on shut down and therefore prevent it from wreaking havoc on the next start up? That's providing that your definitions are up to date and the sneaky little virus is a "known virus". Secondly, which is best, A or B: A - Late night scan B - No scan at all Best wishes, DaveG

Eric, One of the ADVANCED properties of AVG is to run a scan and close the computer. So if your scan was scheduled for (around) 11pm you could safely leave the computer running knowing that after the scan it would switch itself off. DaveG

The answer seems to be simple: Have you tried the EXE file from your hard drive? How long does it take to start up (it should be instantaneous)? If all is well from the hard drive try a flash memory key - once again it should be instantaneous. Try it without the Autorun - how long does it take to open the CD in Explorer so that you can start it Manually? DaveG