davegee

Alternatively PF, If you follow what is becoming standard procedure for PTE and having ONE FOLDER PER PROJECT and no sub-folders this problem would never occur. You cannot save two files in the same folder with the same name. Another variation on the same theme is - keep the folder near to the root of your drive until finished and then save as a template to wherever you want. Merry Xmas, DaveG

Well done Ian! Up to your usual standard - the master shows us all how to do it once again! Merry Xmas. DaveG

Hi Igor, Full path: Z:\PTE Templates\Oberissalm1920.pt\MPEG TEST\Project1.pte P.S. I transferred the images to Z:\Temp\MPEG TEST\Project1.pte and tried agan and DID NOT get the error message. DaveG

Sorry Igor - yes Beta 16. DaveG

Hi Igor, When creating "HD Video for PC or Mac" I am getting the attached error message at the end of the creation of the video EVERY time. The video is created and plays but the message appears every time.(Windows XP SP2). DaveG

Igor, Would it be possible to place a preset number of equidistant "markers" along the timeline for each slide? In this way, if a slide is synchronised precisely to a bar of music or a number of bars of music, the placement of each beat of the music could be seen precisely without the need for calculation or reference to the waveform which can be extremely difficult. I would suggest that the number of marker presets should be multiples of both 2 and 3 to cater for all time signatures - 2/4, 3/4, 4/4 etc. This would be a tremendous help when synchronising keyframes to a piece of music where the waveform does not display a marked peak "on the beat". Thanks, DaveG

Lin, I recently did a series of MPEGs for a MAC user which had no PZR effects and just fade in/out transitions. The MAC user was delighted. I will try to go a little further with PZR but I suspect that you are correct. Did you try with lower resolution MPEGs? DaveG

Thanks Ken, The same to you also, and to all PTE'ers. DaveG

Bob, In addition to what Peter has said, if you have more than two keyframes AND change the type of PZR from LINEAR to anything else, you will need to go into the SETTING UP / SPEED OPTIONS and change each of the keyframe transition points from SEPARATE HERE to GLUE HERE. DaveG

..... and if Igor did this the first thing that would happen is that someone would want to know why the file that they right clicked on did not open up as they expected it to!!! Lin, I appluad your methodology with JPEGs BUT not everyone does that. Nor are some people aware of the implications of O, E and R-S'ing. The general consensus amongst people who ask about the "best" slide show software at places like Nikonians is that PTE is too complicated and (I hate to say this!!!!!) unintuitive. I can provide links to these statements if required. What I want from PTE is that it should do what it was always intended to do - create the best quality slide shows. Bells and whistles don't interest me in the slightest. I know how to open CS3 or Audition if required without having PTE do it for me. DaveG

Hi Lin, You said:"Is it really any different in substance than clicking on an Icon and viewing a JPG in Photoshop or Irfanview, etc.? When we open a jpg in any image editor we have the option of viewing it, editing it and re-saving or closing and opening a different file." I really wouldn't know because I make it a habit to always go back to the RAW file in NX2 OR keep CS3/4 open when working on files for PTE so that if I need to, I can make an edit and then save to my PTE project folder. I don't need to send the JPEG to CS3 - it is usually open in the form of a layered PSD. I gave up on shooting JPEG a long time ago. Saving VERSIONS of the same file within NEFs or PSD files is simple and allows for return to any part of the creative process without the need for having numerous TIFF files of the same original. Same goes for sound files - I keep AUDITION open when working on a file for PTE. I make it a habit to save as WAV version as well as MP3 so that I can go back to an uncompressed file if I want to do any editing. During this discussion we have refered to JPEGs and MP3s as though they are always the same in terms of quality. JPEGs, as we all know, can be quality 1 to quality 12. Would you apply the same rules to a quality 1 JPEG as to a quality 12 JPEG? Where would you draw the line? With MP3 files would you apply the same rules to a 20 Kbps file as to a 320 Kpbs file? Again, where would you draw the line? I am of the opinion that it is far safer to make a generalization that JPEG and MP3 files should not be repeatedly opened, edited and re-saved. That way, good working practice is promoted. DaveG

OK Lin, Now that we agree on something let's go back and consider Peter's statement: ".....we could right click on an item in the Project Options...Music tab and be taken into our nominated sound editor with that sound file opened ready for edit". That implies that it would be possible to open, edit and re-save an MP3 file, apply further compression and further degradation of the sound and be able to do that as many times as necessary to get it right. I know that Peter indicated (correctly in my view) that he uses WAV files until he has got it right and then converts to MP3. But if that facility were incorporated into PTE it would be implying to someone less knowledgeable that it is "correct" to do the same thing with MP3 files. In my honest opinion opening, editing and re-saving any JPEG or MP3 file is (what I call) "bad practice". I don't think that PTE should subscribe to something which could be interpreted as "bad practice". That's all I meant by my previous comments. It is nothing new - I have said this many times in this forum. DaveG

Lin, I'll try to re-word: The point I was trying to convey (the point I have always tried to convey) is that the losses involved when saving to a compressed format (JPEG, MP3) are non-recoverable. "Decompressing" does not recover the losses nor does it "fix" JPEG artifacts. DaveG

Hi Peter, I wasn't pointing a finger at anyone in particular. Your first sentence seems to agree with the principle that you should remain in the "lossless" state until the very end - we are in agreement. WRT JPEGs and "Compression/Decompression" - converting to JPEG is a one way street - there is no "Decompression". DaveG

Hi all, Sorry to have to disagree, once again, about this. The ability to take an already compressed file into another programme for edited is encouraging bad practice. This subject has been covered before. You should always go back to the last saved TIFF, PSD or WAV file and start from there. With regard to JPEGs there is a whole chapter on it in Martin Evenings CS3 book where he discourages that practice. I know that many people do it and they do not see any differences in the files - but the difference is there, however minute and I don't think that PTE, or any other programme, should be encouraging bad practice. DaveG

Steve, A couple of thoughts: Why not make the project 15:10 - same AR as the 720x480 NTSC (and DSLR format)? If the 4:3 AR is absolute and cannot be changed why not make the images 4:3 within the 15:10 AR and create the black lines in the project? Either way - no distortion. DaveG

What's this all about? I regularly visit other forums in the thirst for knowledge about photography, techniques, advice etc etc and I visit places like the Nikonians and Nikon Cafe. The question of Slide Show recommendations crops up frequently and is an ideal opportunity to promote PTE to a MUCH wider audience. There is a thread active at the moment here: http://www.nikonians.org/forums/dcboard.ph...50479&page= ....which I have contributed to. Could I suggest to any of you who have the time that a visit and contribution to the thread would help to keep it active and raise the profile of PTE to a huge audience? Membership is free and quite easy to get. Also, if you visit other forums (you might know of some Canon forums) where the same thing applies, you let the rest of us know so that we can do the same thing there? It's infiltration of a sort, but in the nicest possible way - these good people out there deserve to know about good products and PTE is just one such product. We should share it. I have also recommended Beechbrook and Beckhamdigital to those good people at Nikonians as places to download good examples of the product. DaveG

Well done Brian, I have been promoting this for the last six months here at the PTE forums. You have to see it to believe it. The DVI / HDMI hook-up is essential for the best quality and it surpasses DVD. Even when Blu-Ray becomes common place to convert PTE shows to DVD the PTE EXE played this way is still going to be better quality-wise. DaveG

Barry, Surely you will not be approached regarding something which is not working in a BETA? I would have thought that the version you would be selling would be the last full working version - 5.52? The decision then lies with the customer whether or not to download/upgrade to Beta versions. DaveG

Bob, Use 1024x768 (OR 1280x960 to match your DELL monitor). For those with CRT TVs the aspect ratio is 4:3 same as 1024x768 (OR 1280x960). Those with LCDs will see it with black lines to either side. The DVD/Video resolution will be 720x576 anyway so the resolution won't matter that much. It's the aspect ratio which you have to consider. DaveG

Quick Time, of all of the programmes which will work with the PTE generated MP4 files on my computers, is the MOST reliable. Furthermore, if you plan on sharing your file with a MAC user, the chances are that QuickTime is the ONLY programme the MAC user will have. So trying an MP4 out in QuickTime before sharing would seem to be a wise thing to do. Rather than uninstalling QuickTime, I would suggest downloading the latest version and getting it to work. On the other hand, I installed my MP4 codec (on my desktop) using Lin's instructions from a while back - I wonder if that's the reason I had no problems from then on. On my Vista laptop I never had a codec problem. BTW - I don't associate these files with QuickTime, I just right click on them, choose "Open With" QuickTime, ignore the offer to associate and they play just great. Doing it this way does not upset my other file associations. DaveG

Hi Barry, Just to answer part of your question - it must be fully workable: http://www.picturestoexe.com/forums/index....913&hl=ipod DaveG

Tom, It has been doing that on my computer since 5.1. DaveG

Hi Stu, I am aware of what you say - it is the AVOIDANCE of the System folder that led me to write this. I don't want to be bothered with the system folder and I'm sure a lot of people feel the same way. I was purely pointing out that it is not a fault that the screensaver cannot be chosen from the list of default screensavers if changed for some reason - it is just a different, EASIER, SAFER, way of doing it. DaveG

Peter, The procedure is the same for both XP and Vista. The current screensaver I am using was made prior to 5.6 Beta 10. DaveG