Jump to content
WnSoft Forums

potwnc

Members
  • Content Count

    488
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About potwnc

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://www.peoplesoftheworld.org

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    North Carolina, USA
  • Interests
    Slideshow production for education; indigenous peoples, their culture, assimilation and their changing world; philanthropy; non-profit fundraising.

Recent Profile Visitors

2,351 profile views
  1. I hope you will consider allowing control of color output spaces for video output (especially HDR color spaces like P3-D60) in version 11. Without this feature version 11 would be years out of date compared to the competition.
  2. Thanks, Igor. Hopefully in the next version then.
  3. Just downloaded beta 4 and will test soon. In the meantime, just 1 question: which output color spaces are supported for video output? Any HDR color spaces?
  4. I don't think it's just a display problem. Can you check your Pascal compiler for 23976 / 1000? It may be rounding to 23.980.
  5. I haven't used 32-bit Windows since 11 years ago. (I'm actually surprised that Microsoft still has 32-bit Windows 8, 8.1 and 10.) I would imagine there is some way to get official numbers - either published by Microsoft themselves or by some respected industry group such as Gartner.
  6. As long as PTE can output H.264/MP4, there are multiple free programs available to convert (transcode) that video into MPEG-2 format and author a DVD. So, I say don't waste time updating VideoBuilder - getting PTE 10 to market is more important.
  7. This may seem trivial and unimportant, but it is actually critical. In PTE 8, 24p video renders to 23.976 fps, which is the standard for 24p. In PTE 9 video renders to 23.980 fps. A tiny difference, yes. But I need to re-render PTE video output using third-party software and my software does not recognize 23.98 as an input fps rate. Can this be corrected so that PTE 9 renders to 23.976 fps?
  8. Just hoping that v10 will have video output to DCI color space and not just rec 709.
  9. I am writing from the perspective of someone who only uses PTE for output to video. While PTE has grown a lot over the years in terms of video capability, it is seriously behind the competition in 2018. In a search for something like "consumer non-linear video editors" it is hardly represented. Maybe WnSoft doesn't want PTE to be marketed as such. If so, I think that's a big mistake. Some of the necessary improvements, such as a wider range of video framerates, have already been discussed recently. We now live in a world where wide-gamut viewing devices (not only TVs, but device
  10. Less interest than I expected in this topic. So, to close it, the screenshot on the left is from a video created in Vegas Pro 15. The original image was shot on a Nikon D800 in Adobe RGB. The video was rendered to DCI-P3 and I had my monitor in (callibrated) Adobe RGB mode. So, obviously, the screenshot on the right is from the video created in PTE 9. I don't know what color space it renders mp4 video to - I would guess either sRGB or REC 709.
  11. In a few days I'll be making a lengthy post in the "suggestions" section, but first I'd like to solicit some opinion here. The attached image has the same screenshot (actual pixels, Adobe RGB color space) from identical 4K videos - one made with PTE v9, the other with a leading, professional Non-Linear Editing program. Full disclosure: I'm using a pretty high-end monitor (callibrated 4K BenQ SW27). If you're using a standard sRGB monitor the two versions of the screenshot may not look all that different to you, so if you comment that you can't tell the difference, please also include in the co
  12. Although I am rendering to 60p, I'm getting 59.94 fps. Is there no way to get 60.00 fps? 60p typically means 60.00, doesn't it?
  13. Excellent, Lin, as always! Regarding file size, typically MP4 encoding will be more efficient at 60 fps vs 30 fps for the same source material, so the storage requirement would be less than double - although the exact numbers depend on many factors. I see that you targeted a bit rate of 16Mbps. A typical (commercial) MP4 encode at 1920x1080x24p would target around 20Mbps. For 60p I'd recommend you target at least 25Mbps - even as high as 40Mbps (although your file size would then be truly enormous). I played it on a fairly old system with MPC Home Cinema 64-bit and the playback was smoot
  14. I would also be interested in seeing the finished product. This preview looks wonderful. One suggestion - and of course, this is just my opinion - would be to make the flag smaller. I found that it obscured things I was trying to read while it was "blowing."
  15. I don't think 800x600x30p is a supported Blu-ray standard. Can you try 1920x1080x24p?
×
×
  • Create New...